Transparent reporting of SafeLens AI performance across all health detection categories
Comprehensive accuracy measurements validated against clinical standards
Across all detection categories
True positive detection rate
True negative detection rate
Positive predictive value
Detailed accuracy metrics for each health detection category
Validated on 15,000 dermoscopic images
Validated on 8,500 clinical images
Compared to dermatologist grading
Correlated with serum B12 levels
Validated against ferritin levels
Compared to urine specific gravity
Validated against cortisol levels
Compared to sleep quality scores
Validated against PHQ-9 scores
Transparent reporting of model limitations and factors affecting accuracy
Models updated quarterly with new training data and improved algorithms
Continuous monitoring of real-world performance and user feedback
Ongoing collaboration with medical experts to validate and improve accuracy
We believe in open, honest reporting of our AI performance to build trust and enable informed decisions
We report both strengths and limitations of our AI models without exaggeration
Accuracy reports updated quarterly with the latest validation results
All accuracy claims reviewed and validated by independent medical experts
For detailed technical reports or questions about our validation methodology:
Contact Our Research Team